![](http://archive.cnu.org/sites/www.cnu.org/files/imagecache/newsthumb/join_cnu.png)
The results of de-gentrification
![MLewyn's picture MLewyn's picture](http://archive.cnu.org/sites/www.cnu.org/files/pictures/picture-194.jpg)
When a city recovers from the urban decline of the late 20th century, there is often a lot of media blather about the evils of gentrification. According to gentriphobes, working-class (mostly black) people lived together in peace and harmony before the onslaught of (mostly white) hipsters and yuppies drove up rents.
A recent article in (of all places) the Atlantic lends a dose of reality to the gentrification argument. It points out that Washington's U Street neighborhood (one of Washington's newly gentrifying areas) lost 1/3 of its (mostly black) population between 1980 and 2000, when U Street was a poorer and more troubled area than it now is. In fact, black population loss slowed over the past decade.
Why? Because black people (even not-so-well-off black people) don't like living in crime-ridden hellholes any more than anyone else does. As a result, a poor, troubled neighborhood exports its neighborhoods far more rapidly than one which is desirable but more expensive.
Comments
Write your comments in the box below and share on your Facebook!